Skip to main content

Is Trump’s Two-Week Timeline for Ending the Iran War Realistic?

The latest declarations from the White House have sent shockwaves through global markets, as President Donald Trump suggests the U.S. could wind down its military campaign against Iran within two to three weeks. However, as domestic petrol prices climb past $4 a gallon and the Strait of Hormuz remains a volatile chokepoint, many are questioning if this mission accomplished narrative is premature. The reality on the ground characterized by a lack of formal negotiations and a mowing the lawn military strategy suggests that ending this conflict will be far more complex than a simple withdrawal. The Stone Age Strategy: Defining the U.S. Military Objective President Trump has pivoted from seeking a diplomatic grand bargain to a strategy of pure attrition. By stating that a deal is no longer necessary, he has redefined success as the degradation of Iran’s capabilities to the point of being put into the Stone Ages.This shift signals an Israelization of American war aims, where the goal is n...

Malik Riaz calls for ‘truce’ amid Bahria Town’s legal woes

 

Property tycoon Malik Riaz on Tuesday called for “dialogue and a dignified solution” amidst Bahria Town’s legal troubles.

His appeal comes as the Islamabad High Court (IHC) reserved its verdict on petitions against the proposed auction of Bahria Town properties. The assets were attached in connection with a plea bargain agreement reached in the £190 million case. The development adds on to the National Accountability Bureau’s (NAB) previous actions against Riaz, who owns Bahria Town and is an absconder in the Al-Qadir Trust case.

NAB had said last month that the tycoon and his son Ali Riaz had entered into a plea bargain in the 190 million pounds case, but failed to pay the agreed amount. As a result, NAB had sought details of several properties, which were to be auctioned to recover the amount under Sec­tion 33E of NAB Ordinance, 1999.

In 2019, the National Crime Agency (NCA) of the United Kingdom had agreed to a settlement worth £190 million with Riaz’s family. Earlier that year, the Supreme Court had accepted Riaz’s offer of Rs460 billion as settlement dues by his Bahria Town after it was found to have illegally acquired thousands of acres of land on Karachi’s outskirts in district Malir. Hours after the NCA verdict, Riaz had tweeted that the recovered amount would go to the Supreme Court against the fine worth Rs460bn. Subsequently, the money was transferred to the Supreme Court’s accounts, instead of the government’s account.

On October 20, 2023, the Supreme Court had notedthat “only Rs60.72bn out of Rs460bn was paid. Even out of this payment, Bahria Town paid only Rs24.26bn”.

In a post on X today, Riaz said: “I would like to make a final appeal from the bottom of my heart that we be given a chance to return to serious dialogue, and a dignified solution.

“For this purpose, we assure you that we will participate in any arbitration and implement its decision 100 per cent,” the property tycoon added. “On this occasion, I also assure you that if the arbitration decision requires payment of money from our side, we will ensure its payment, God willing.”

Riaz said that he had confidence that the institutions of Pakistan would act “with justice, wisdom, and prudence, and they will play a positive role in leading us out of this difficult juncture”.

Last month, the IHC issued notices to respondents on a petition of NAB seeking to vacate the stay order on its move to auction six properties of Bahria Town in Rawalpindi and Islamabad.

In June, NAB ordered the freezing of over 450 immovable properties owned by various individuals named in the Bahria Town Karachi land grab case.

In the same month, the IHC had issued a stay order halting the NAB’s planned auction of Bahria Town’s properties. The auction was scheduled to be held the same day, i.e. June 12

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No Ban On Airing Imran's Speeches, Pemra Tells LHC

 In a recent development, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) clarified to the Lahore High Court that there is no longer a ban on broadcasting former Prime Minister Imran Khan's speeches. This revelation came during the hearing of a petition filed by Imran, who had challenged Pemra's decision to prohibit satellite TV channels from airing his speeches and press talks. The initial ban was imposed swiftly after Imran criticized former army chief Qamar Javed Bajwa, accusing him of shielding current rulers in alleged corruption cases. Imran argued that Pemra's ban was fueled by vengeance, leading to a legal battle that spanned eight hearings. During the recent court session, Justice Shams Mehmood Mirza stressed that Pemra should refrain from pressuring TV channels on the concerns raised by the petitioner. Surprisingly, Pemra's counsel, Haroon Duggal, stated unequivocally that there is no existing ban on broadcasting Imran Khan's speeches. This reso...

Democracy in Action: The Return of Nawaz Sharif and Calls for Prompt Elections

  In a dramatic turn of events, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s return to Pakistan after four years in self-exile has sparked discussions on the political landscape and the urgency for upcoming elections. Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari, addressing the Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan, emphasized the need for timely polls in the wake of the weekend’s events. The Call for Prompt Elections Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari’s statement, although not explicitly naming Nawaz Sharif, underlines the significance of recent developments and their potential impact on the political timeline. The call for “no further delay” in elections resonates with the idea that a swift electoral process is essential for the democratic process to unfold smoothly. Nawaz Sharif’s Return: A Game-Changer? Nawaz Sharif’s return to Pakistan on October 21 marked a pivotal moment in the nation’s political dynamics. After completing legal formalities in Islamabad, Sharif addressed a ...

Has Social Media Become the Loudest Voice for Justice in the Israel-Palestine Conflict?

  In a world filled with turmoil and suffering, social media emerges as a powerful force challenging narratives, demanding justice, and giving voice to the voiceless. The recent conflict in the Middle East has not only exposed the harsh realities faced by the Palestinians but also highlighted the evolving role of social media in shaping global opinions. The Unheard Voices of Palestine: A Cry for Justice As violence escalated, Palestinian voices struggled to be heard amidst a media landscape seemingly biased against them. The article delves into how mainstream Western media outlets inadvertently became mouthpieces for one side, prompting a surge in social media activism. Social Media as the Unfiltered Truth The narrative unfolds, revealing the dichotomy between mainstream media and the unfiltered truth found on social media platforms. Gripping accounts, poignant images, and raw emotions flooded these platforms, contrasting starkly with the restrained coverage from major news outlet...