Skip to main content

Is Trump’s Two-Week Timeline for Ending the Iran War Realistic?

The latest declarations from the White House have sent shockwaves through global markets, as President Donald Trump suggests the U.S. could wind down its military campaign against Iran within two to three weeks. However, as domestic petrol prices climb past $4 a gallon and the Strait of Hormuz remains a volatile chokepoint, many are questioning if this mission accomplished narrative is premature. The reality on the ground characterized by a lack of formal negotiations and a mowing the lawn military strategy suggests that ending this conflict will be far more complex than a simple withdrawal. The Stone Age Strategy: Defining the U.S. Military Objective President Trump has pivoted from seeking a diplomatic grand bargain to a strategy of pure attrition. By stating that a deal is no longer necessary, he has redefined success as the degradation of Iran’s capabilities to the point of being put into the Stone Ages.This shift signals an Israelization of American war aims, where the goal is n...

Pakistan, Iran eye $10 bn bilateral trade as PM arrives in Tehran

 


Tehran: Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif said that the bilateral trade between Pakistan and Iran which stood at $3 billion, would be taken to $10 billion volume in the next few years, as there was immense potential of growth.

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Monday departed to Iran after concluding his two-day official visit to Turkiye.

In an interview with IRNA, prior to his visit to Tehran on Monday, the prime minister said the bilateral trade between the two countries had witnessed a significant increase in the past three to four years.

“We want to take it up to $10 billion in the next few years, but I think the potential is much larger than that as well. We are discussing signing a free trade agreement (FTA). I think in the next ten years, the trade volume between the two countries will expand a great deal. The need is to have sustained economic engagements for the long term between Pakistan and Iran,” the Iranian news wire quoted the prime minister as saying.

The prime minister, to a query, replied that he strongly believed that the economic destiny of both countries was interlinked as they shared a border of about 900 kilometers.

“I personally believe that strong economic linkage between Pakistan’s Balochistan and Iran’s Sistan-Baluchestan can be good for the entire region. It can also be very effective in dealing with terrorism,” he added.

He further mentioned that the two countries had signed memoranda of understanding about developing projects between these provinces.

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif further underscored the need of sustained economic engagement between Iran and Pakistan.

To a question regarding his Iran’s visit, the prime minister said that he was undertaking the visit at the invitation of President Masoud Pezeshkian.

“The principal objective of my visit is to thank Iran for supporting and standing by us during our conflict with India. India, as you know, imposed war on us, which we repulsed through a decisive but measured and well-calibrated response consistent with international humanitarian law. So, I want to thank Iranian leadership for its support and its offer for mediation, which we accepted but India rejected,” he added.

He said that during his visit, he would also discuss the bilateral relations and issues of mutual interests.



The prime minister also appreciated the excellent bilateral ties between the brotherly countries, adding Islamabad and Tehran would continue to support each other on issues of Muslim Ummah and regional cooperation.

Responding to another question, he said that he strongly believed there could be no peace and justice in the region till resolution of Kashmir and Palestine issues, reiterating that it was critically important that these issues should be resolved in accordance with the aspirations of the Kashmiri and Palestinian people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No Ban On Airing Imran's Speeches, Pemra Tells LHC

 In a recent development, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) clarified to the Lahore High Court that there is no longer a ban on broadcasting former Prime Minister Imran Khan's speeches. This revelation came during the hearing of a petition filed by Imran, who had challenged Pemra's decision to prohibit satellite TV channels from airing his speeches and press talks. The initial ban was imposed swiftly after Imran criticized former army chief Qamar Javed Bajwa, accusing him of shielding current rulers in alleged corruption cases. Imran argued that Pemra's ban was fueled by vengeance, leading to a legal battle that spanned eight hearings. During the recent court session, Justice Shams Mehmood Mirza stressed that Pemra should refrain from pressuring TV channels on the concerns raised by the petitioner. Surprisingly, Pemra's counsel, Haroon Duggal, stated unequivocally that there is no existing ban on broadcasting Imran Khan's speeches. This reso...

Democracy in Action: The Return of Nawaz Sharif and Calls for Prompt Elections

  In a dramatic turn of events, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s return to Pakistan after four years in self-exile has sparked discussions on the political landscape and the urgency for upcoming elections. Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari, addressing the Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan, emphasized the need for timely polls in the wake of the weekend’s events. The Call for Prompt Elections Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari’s statement, although not explicitly naming Nawaz Sharif, underlines the significance of recent developments and their potential impact on the political timeline. The call for “no further delay” in elections resonates with the idea that a swift electoral process is essential for the democratic process to unfold smoothly. Nawaz Sharif’s Return: A Game-Changer? Nawaz Sharif’s return to Pakistan on October 21 marked a pivotal moment in the nation’s political dynamics. After completing legal formalities in Islamabad, Sharif addressed a ...

Has Social Media Become the Loudest Voice for Justice in the Israel-Palestine Conflict?

  In a world filled with turmoil and suffering, social media emerges as a powerful force challenging narratives, demanding justice, and giving voice to the voiceless. The recent conflict in the Middle East has not only exposed the harsh realities faced by the Palestinians but also highlighted the evolving role of social media in shaping global opinions. The Unheard Voices of Palestine: A Cry for Justice As violence escalated, Palestinian voices struggled to be heard amidst a media landscape seemingly biased against them. The article delves into how mainstream Western media outlets inadvertently became mouthpieces for one side, prompting a surge in social media activism. Social Media as the Unfiltered Truth The narrative unfolds, revealing the dichotomy between mainstream media and the unfiltered truth found on social media platforms. Gripping accounts, poignant images, and raw emotions flooded these platforms, contrasting starkly with the restrained coverage from major news outlet...