The latest declarations from the White House have sent shockwaves through global markets, as President Donald Trump suggests the U.S. could wind down its military campaign against Iran within two to three weeks. However, as domestic petrol prices climb past $4 a gallon and the Strait of Hormuz remains a volatile chokepoint, many are questioning if this mission accomplished narrative is premature. The reality on the ground characterized by a lack of formal negotiations and a mowing the lawn military strategy suggests that ending this conflict will be far more complex than a simple withdrawal. The Stone Age Strategy: Defining the U.S. Military Objective President Trump has pivoted from seeking a diplomatic grand bargain to a strategy of pure attrition. By stating that a deal is no longer necessary, he has redefined success as the degradation of Iran’s capabilities to the point of being put into the Stone Ages.This shift signals an Israelization of American war aims, where the goal is n...
The National Assembly of Pakistan recently passed a bill to increase the number of judges in both the Supreme Court and the Islamabad High Court (IHC), addressing the growing demands on the judiciary. The bill, introduced by Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) lawmaker Daniyal Chaudhry, raises the number of Supreme Court justices from 17 to 23, with the aim of expediting case resolutions in the country’s highest court. Similarly, the IHC will see an increase in judges to better manage its case load, reflecting efforts to strengthen judicial efficiency.
The decision to expand the Supreme Court’s bench has been a long-discussed issue, as it is expected to help with the significant backlog of cases pending resolution. However, the bill’s passage faced some political challenges, including objections raised by opposition leaders, who questioned the necessity and timing of the amendment. Despite these concerns, the bill has moved forward to the standing committee for further deliberation .

Comments
Post a Comment