The latest declarations from the White House have sent shockwaves through global markets, as President Donald Trump suggests the U.S. could wind down its military campaign against Iran within two to three weeks. However, as domestic petrol prices climb past $4 a gallon and the Strait of Hormuz remains a volatile chokepoint, many are questioning if this mission accomplished narrative is premature. The reality on the ground characterized by a lack of formal negotiations and a mowing the lawn military strategy suggests that ending this conflict will be far more complex than a simple withdrawal. The Stone Age Strategy: Defining the U.S. Military Objective President Trump has pivoted from seeking a diplomatic grand bargain to a strategy of pure attrition. By stating that a deal is no longer necessary, he has redefined success as the degradation of Iran’s capabilities to the point of being put into the Stone Ages.This shift signals an Israelization of American war aims, where the goal is n...
Imran Khan, Chairman-for-life of the PTI, has stirred controversy with an article in The Economist expressing concerns about the upcoming elections.
While the party denies AI involvement, Imran admits he “verbally dictated” the article, suggesting an unconventional process.
He criticizes the government’s economic performance and accuses the establishment of hindering PTI. Imran alleges assassination attempts, abductions, and coercion against his party members.
He questions the courts’ credibility, accusing them of favoring Nawaz Sharif, whom he believes struck a deal with the establishment for support in the elections. The situation adds complexity to the political landscape.

Comments
Post a Comment